The Security Business Nobody AnnouncedWide moat
Microsoft (MSFT) — moat facet
Microsoft quietly became the largest security company on earth by charging almost nothing extra — a price no independent vendor can answer.
The most successful business Microsoft built this decade is one it barely markets as a business. Its security products generated roughly $37 billion in fiscal 2025 — larger than CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks and Zscaler combined1 — which makes Microsoft, quietly, the largest cybersecurity company in the world.
It was assembled almost entirely through bundling. Identity sits in Entra, endpoint protection in Defender, monitoring in Sentinel, and all of them arrive inside enterprise agreements customers already sign for Office and Azure. For a company paying for the top Microsoft 365 tier, adding Microsoft's security tools costs little or nothing incremental — which is a pricing structure no independent vendor can answer, because they have no bundle to hide the cost in.
The vulnerability is reputational and regulatory rather than competitive. Microsoft is simultaneously the largest supplier of the software being attacked and the largest supplier of the protection against those attacks, and serious breaches of its own systems have drawn government criticism that a pure-play vendor would never face. Bundling security is also precisely the behaviour antitrust regulators examined in the Teams case. Watch for security being unbundled under regulatory pressure, and watch whether the specialists keep winning the largest, most security-conscious enterprises — which is where good-enough-and-included stops being the winning argument.
A roughly $37 billion franchise larger than the three biggest specialists combined, growing because adding it to an existing agreement costs customers almost nothing. The threats are not competitive but regulatory and reputational — bundling security is precisely the conduct examined in the Teams case, and Microsoft's own breaches have drawn government criticism.
Larger than CrowdStrike, Palo Alto and Zscaler combined, built by bundling Entra, Defender and Sentinel into agreements customers already sign. The risk is regulatory rather than competitive: bundling is exactly the conduct examined in the Teams case. Watch for forced unbundling and whether specialists keep the most security-conscious accounts.
Source: Microsoft security franchise analysis ↗- Third-party estimateRoughly $37B of security revenue in fiscal 2025 — larger than CrowdStrike, Palo Alto and Zscaler combined — assembled by bundling.Market analysis of Microsoft's security franchise — roughly $37B of cybersecurity revenue in fiscal 2025 (~14% of total revenue), larger than CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks and Zscaler combined; built by bundling Entra, Defender and Sentinel into existing Microsoft 365 and Azure agreements — FY2025-2026 · publ. 2026 · source ↗