Barrick MiningThin moat

B — overall economic moat

Investment snapshot
Thin moat→ Holding steadyConfidenceMediumValuationFair
Strongest advantageTier-one gold & copper assets
Greatest threatNo pricing power (commodity price-taker)
Key metricROIC vs WACC (est.)
Verdict: The near-moatless case in the set: real tier-one assets, but a commodity price-taker whose fortunes ride the gold price, not a moat.
📈 B valuation, revenue & earnings — P/E, P/S, revenue, EPS →

Barrick digs metal out of the ground and sells it at whatever price the world happens to be paying that morning. There is no product decision, no pricing decision, no customer relationship — gold is gold, and an ounce from Nevada fetches exactly what an ounce from anywhere else fetches. That single fact governs everything about the company, and it is why this page exists in an app about moats: Barrick is the control group, the business that shows what the absence of pricing power looks like.

FY2025 revenue by metal, $16.96BGold — 91%Copper — 9%The copper share is why 'Gold' came out of the name in 2025 — both prices are set by the market
Two commodities, zero pricing decisions: the whole revenue line is a bet on prices Barrick does not set and cannot influence.

The money map is a two-metal split. Of 2025's $16.96 billion in revenue1, roughly $15.5 billion came from gold and about $1.5 billion from copper — the copper share rising enough that in 2025 the company dropped 'Gold' from a name it had carried since 1983 and became Barrick Mining. Production comes from a portfolio built around what the industry calls Tier One assets: Nevada Gold Mines, the joint venture with Newmont that is the largest gold complex on earth, plus Pueblo Viejo in the Dominican Republic, Kibali in the Congo, Loulo-Gounkoto in Mali and Lumwana in Zambia.

Because the price is given, the only variables management controls are volume, cost and jurisdiction — and the earnings chart shows what happens when those go wrong. Barrick lost money in 2012, 2013, 2014 and again in 2018, including a $10.4 billion loss in 2013 as writedowns landed on assets bought at the top of the last cycle. The current picture is the opposite: gold's rally has driven trailing revenue to about $19.1 billion and net income to roughly $6.1 billion, with second-quarter 2026 revenue up 44% year over year2. None of that improvement was earned by being cleverer. It was earned by the gold price.

The market understands this perfectly, which is why the shares trade near 12 times earnings — a fraction of what a branded consumer business commands — and why that multiple compresses when metal prices peak and expands when they collapse. A low multiple on cyclical peak earnings is not a bargain; it is the market declining to capitalize a windfall.

What follows examines both halves honestly. The Moat asks what a price-taker can actually own — irreplaceable ore bodies, a position on the cost curve, reserves that outlast the cycle, scale — and rates it thin, because none of that is pricing power. The Future Bets follow where the company is putting its windfall: the Fourmile discovery and the Newmont settlement, a North American listing, and two copper mines in Zambia and Pakistan. Its two metals are taken in turn in The Revenue Lines.

The number that tests this moat
Reported
Revenue, and where it comes from
$16.96B FY2025 — ~91% gold

Roughly $15.5B of gold and ~$1.5B of copper, sold at prices Barrick does not set — which is why Q2 2026 revenue rose 44% on the metal, not on operating improvement. Watch the copper share: the Lumwana and Reko Diq bets are an attempt to make this mix look different by the end of the decade.

Source: Barrick FY2025 annual report ↗
Moat scorecardHow ratings work →
Switching costs1/10
Network effects1/10
Pricing power2/10
Hard to replicate5/10
Disruption resistance4/10
Overall durability3/10

A commodity price-taker with tier-one assets but no pricing power — the near-moatless case in the set.

Dig deeper
✦ Future bets — beyond today's moat
⚠ Threats to the moat
◆ What the market may be missing
References
  1. ReportedFY2025 revenue $16.96B — roughly $15.5B gold and ~$1.5B copper, the shift that took 'Gold' out of the company's name in 2025.
    Barrick FY2025 annual report — revenue $16.96B, net income $4.99B, EPS $2.93, gold production 3.26Moz, AISC ~$1,637/oz — FY2025 · publ. March 2026 · source ↗
  2. ReportedQ2 2026 revenue rose 44% year over year on the gold price, not on operating improvement.
    Barrick Q2 2026 MD&A (SEC Form 6-K exhibit) — Reko Diq development slowed with reduced capital expenditure and the project review extended, flagging potential significant increases to the capital budget and timeline; Lumwana Super Pit spend profile; Fourmile to be incorporated into the NGM joint venture; planned IPO of the North American gold assets — Q2 2026 · publ. August 10, 2026 · source ↗
Sources
Generated September 23, 2026