⚠ Jurisdiction & Political RiskHigh threat

Barrick Mining (B) — threat to the moat

Great deposits sit where they sit — Mali, the Congo, Pakistan — and the ground under a mine can shift politically overnight.

Gold does not care about borders, and much of the world's best remaining gold sits in countries where the rule of law is thin and the government's appetite for a bigger share is thick. This is the second great risk to Barrick, and it is inseparable from the first advantage: the very irreplaceability that makes Tier-One deposits valuable also means a miner must go where the gold is, which is frequently somewhere politically dangerous.

2026 gold AISC guidance ($/oz, midpoint)Loulo-Gounkoto, Mali$2,640-2,900Company total$1,760-1,950Kibali, DRC$1,330-1,470Barrick Q2 2026 MD&A, 2026 guidance by operation
The mine returned from the dispute is the dearest in the portfolio this year.

The live example is Mali, where a dispute with the government over the Loulo-Gounkoto complex1 — one of Barrick's flagship mines — escalated into the state asserting control, detaining staff, blocking exports, and seizing gold, effectively wresting a crown-jewel asset from the company's hands. It is the sharpest illustration imaginable of the difference between owning a mine on paper and controlling it in practice. Nor is Mali unique: Barrick has fought long tax and ownership battles in Tanzania, operates a vast asset in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and is staking its copper future on Reko Diq in Pakistan.

Resource nationalism tends to intensify at exactly the worst moment for a miner. When the gold price is high and the mines are gushing cash, governments see a foreign company extracting a national treasure and grow determined to capture more of it — through higher royalties, forced ownership stakes, export controls, or seizure. So the political risk rises precisely when the profits do, capping the very upside that the price windfall creates.

Barrick manages this risk as well as anyone can — through diversification across many countries, patient relationship-building with governments, and a long institutional memory of these fights — and its scale gives it more leverage in negotiations than a small miner would have. But manage is all it can do; it cannot eliminate the risk, because it cannot move the gold to a safer country. Mali showed how such disputes end: it was resolved in December 2025 on the government's terms, including the 2023 Mining Code, after close to twelve months without production, and the mine was ramping up ahead of plan by mid-20262. A meaningful share of Barrick's asset base will always sit on ground where the company's ownership is, in the last resort, only as secure as the local government allows. That is a permanent discount that no operational excellence can erase, and a threat that belongs near the very top of any honest assessment.

The number that tests this threat
Reported
Production lost to the Mali dispute
Close to 12 months of shutdown at Loulo-Gounkoto from January 2025; control regained December 2025

The dispute was resolved on the government's terms, including the 2023 Mining Code; tax matters are still under discussion.

Source: Barrick second quarter 2026 MD&A (SEC Form 6-K exhibit 99.2) ↗
References
  1. ReportedMali seized control of the Loulo-Gounkoto complex in a tax and ownership dispute.
    The Mali dispute — the government's seizure of control of the Loulo-Gounkoto complex amid a tax and ownership dispute (2024-25) — 2024-2025 · publ. 2025 · source ↗
  2. ReportedThe Mali dispute was resolved in December 2025 on the government's terms, including the 2023 Mining Code, after close to twelve months without production, and the mine was ramping up ahead of plan by mid-2026.
    Barrick second quarter 2026 MD&A (SEC Form 6-K exhibit 99.2) - Loulo-Gounkoto: operations suspended from January 2025, control regained on 16 December 2025 after the dispute with the Government of Mali was resolved, including adoption of the 2023 Mining Code; ramp-up ahead of schedule; revenue, production, costs and cash flow for Q2 and H1 2026 — Q2 2026 · publ. 2026-08-11 · source ↗
Sources
Generated September 23, 2026