⚠ Rent & Staff Don't FlexLow threat

LVMH (MC) — threat to the moat

The boutique's costs roll on when the tourists stop coming.

The owned-boutique model's great weakness is its operating leverage: the costs are largely fixed, so profitability swings hard with sales. Flagship stores sit on the world's priciest streets under long, expensive leases; they are staffed by trained sales and service teams; and none of that cost falls when a downturn empties the store. So when luxury demand softens, an owned-retail model's margins compress faster than a wholesaler's would, because the wholesaler can push inventory risk and store costs onto its retail partners while LVMH bears them directly.

Marketing and selling expenses (€m)€28,151m2022€30,768m2023€31,002m2024LVMH 2024 Universal Registration Document
Selling costs rose 10% from 2022 to 2024 while revenue rose 7%.

This is the deliberate trade LVMH makes — accepting cyclical cost risk in exchange for total control of price and experience — and in good times it is richly rewarded. But it means the boutique network amplifies the downside in a slump, as the 2024-25 softness showed. It is not a danger to the moat, which the owned retail underpins, but a real driver of earnings volatility that owners should size correctly — recurring operating profit fell 4% on a milder revenue dip in H1 20261. Low-to-moderate.

References
  1. ReportedRecurring op profit fell 4% on a milder revenue dip in H1 2026.
    LVMH H1 2026 interim results — revenue €38.6B, profit from recurring operations €8.7B (−4%), group share of net profit €5.7B — H1 2026 · publ. July 2026 · source ↗
Sources
Generated September 23, 2026