⚠ The Resale MarketModerate threat

LVMH (MC) — threat to the moat

The second-hand boom supplies exactly the availability the brand spends fortunes withholding.

The deliberate scarcity that supports luxury pricing is being quietly undercut by the explosive growth of the resale market. When LVMH withholds supply to keep a product exclusive, a thriving second-hand ecosystem — online platforms, consignment, peer-to-peer — steps in to supply it anyway, at prices the brand does not set and cannot fully control. That makes scarce items available to anyone with money, blunting the exclusivity; it creates a visible secondary price that can sit awkwardly against retail; and it opens a channel through which wear, fakes, and grey-market goods circulate under the brand's name. It also, more subtly, teaches younger buyers to treat luxury as a tradeable asset rather than an untouchable dream.

Inventories as a share of annual revenue (%)25.8%202125.7%202226.6%202328.0%2024LVMH 2023 and 2024 URDs; year-end inventories over revenue
More stock per euro of sales each year since 2022: the raw material of a secondary market.

LVMH's control of its own primary distribution remains firm, and a healthy resale market can even reinforce a brand by proving its value holds over time. But it is a large and growing force outside the company's control that chips at the manufactured scarcity the moat depends on — scarcity engineered by houses as old as 18541. A moderate, structural erosion at the edges.

References
  1. ReportedScarcity engineered by houses as old as 1854.
    Maison heritage records — Louis Vuitton founded 1854; Christian Dior's 'New Look' debut 1947 — 1854-1947 · source ↗
Sources
Generated September 23, 2026