⚠ The Resale MarketModerate threat
LVMH (MC) — threat to the moat
The second-hand boom supplies exactly the availability the brand spends fortunes withholding.
The deliberate scarcity that supports luxury pricing is being quietly undercut by the explosive growth of the resale market. When LVMH withholds supply to keep a product exclusive, a thriving second-hand ecosystem — online platforms, consignment, peer-to-peer — steps in to supply it anyway, at prices the brand does not set and cannot fully control. That makes scarce items available to anyone with money, blunting the exclusivity; it creates a visible secondary price that can sit awkwardly against retail; and it opens a channel through which wear, fakes, and grey-market goods circulate under the brand's name. It also, more subtly, teaches younger buyers to treat luxury as a tradeable asset rather than an untouchable dream.
LVMH's control of its own primary distribution remains firm, and a healthy resale market can even reinforce a brand by proving its value holds over time. But it is a large and growing force outside the company's control that chips at the manufactured scarcity the moat depends on — scarcity engineered by houses as old as 18541. A moderate, structural erosion at the edges.
- ReportedScarcity engineered by houses as old as 1854.Maison heritage records — Louis Vuitton founded 1854; Christian Dior's 'New Look' debut 1947 — 1854-1947 · source ↗