Delta, LITEON and the Component Makers Moving UpThin moat

Vertiv Holdings (VRT) — moat facet

The component suppliers named beside Vertiv in Nvidia's reference designs have both the cost structure and the invitation to climb.

Read the ecosystem lists published around the 800 VDC architecture carefully and there are two tiers. The data-center power system providers are the familiar names — ABB, Eaton, GE Vernova, Hitachi Energy, Mitsubishi Electric, Schneider, Siemens and Vertiv. Underneath them sit the power component providers: BizLink, Delta, Flex, LITEON, Megmeet and others1. Vertiv competes today only with the first list. The question is how long the second list stays where it is.

Organic growth, Q2 2026 (%)+19.7%Products+10.1%Services and spares+17.8%TotalVertiv Q2 2026 results release
Products still carry the growth, which is where component makers compete.

The economics push in one direction. Component makers, mostly Asian contract manufacturers, operate at cost structures a US-based systems integrator cannot match, and they are already inside the racks. Historically what kept them out of the systems business was the integration difficulty — knowing how power, cooling, monitoring and service fit together in a live data hall. An open reference architecture, as the previous page argues, reduces exactly that barrier by publishing the answer.

This is the commoditization risk arriving from below rather than beside. It will not take flagship projects first; it will take the standardizable portions — busway, distribution, rack-level components — where the specification is settled and the buyer sees interchangeable parts.

The tell is mix, not share. Watch whether Vertiv's growth increasingly comes from integrated systems and services rather than discrete hardware. A company whose product line is being hollowed out from the bottom keeps growing for years while the average quality of its revenue quietly declines.

Moat trajectory: Narrowing

The component makers are closer to the systems business than they were, and the reason is structural: an open reference architecture publishes the integration knowledge that used to keep them out. Nothing has been lost yet, and flagship projects will stay with the systems integrators for years. But the standardizable parts of the stack are where this starts, and that part of the market is growing fastest.

The number that tests this moat
Reported
Products sales growth, latest quarter
+23.0% to $2,606.4M in Q2 2026

Open 800 VDC specifications let component makers compete for pieces of the system. Product sales growing with the market says Vertiv is still selling systems; a slowdown would show components being bought separately.

Source: Vertiv Q2 2026 results ↗
References
  1. ReportedThe 800 VDC ecosystem separates power system providers from power component providers including BizLink, Delta, Flex, LITEON and Megmeet.
    NVIDIA / Open Compute Project 800 VDC ecosystem — NVIDIA, Google and Microsoft jointly drove an 800-volt DC power architecture published as an open specification through the OCP, with more than 80 equipment manufacturers and infrastructure providers building hardware to it, including ABB, Eaton, Schneider Electric and Vertiv; datacentre power system providers listed as ABB, Eaton, GE Vernova, Heron Power, Hitachi Energy, Mitsubishi Electric, Schneider Electric, Siemens and Vertiv, with power component providers BizLink, Delta, Flex, GE Vernova, Lead Wealth, LITEON and Megmeet; the first MGX-compatible 800 VDC racks enter production in 2H 2026, with a roadmap from 145 kW per rack toward 1 MW — 2026 · publ. 2026 · source ↗
Sources
Generated September 23, 2026