⚠ The Network Is Also a Cost BaseModerate threat

PZU (PZU) — threat to the moat

Thousands of agents are a moat in the countryside and a cost line in a digital world.

A vast physical distribution network is a moat and a millstone at the same time. Thousands of tied agents and a nationwide branch footprint carry a heavy fixed cost — commissions, offices, overhead — that a lean digital insurer selling the same motor policy through a website simply does not bear. In the lines migrating fastest to online, price-driven buying, that cost base is a competitive disadvantage: PZU is paying to maintain a channel some customers no longer want to use.

Expense ratios excluding the banks (% of net revenue)17,2%Acquisition 2Q2517,4%Acquisition 2Q268,6%Admin 2Q258,8%Admin 2Q26PZU 1H26 results presentation
Both expense ratios edged up in a year when revenue barely grew.

The strategic bind is that the network is most valuable exactly where the market is shrinking (agent-sold, relationship-driven cover) and least valuable exactly where it is growing (digital, price-driven motor). Managing that transition — keeping the reach where it still pays while not being dragged down by its cost where it doesn't — is a genuine challenge, and one an incumbent with a large, unionized, state-linked workforce cannot address as ruthlessly as a private challenger might. The moat has a maintenance bill that rises as the world goes online — a bill the >20% ROE currently absorbs without strain1.

References
  1. ReportedThe >20% ROE currently absorbs the bill.
    PZU FY2025 annual results — record net profit ~6,7bn zł (+25%), ROE >20%, Solvency II 234%, dividend 4,47 zł/share (~7% yield) — FY2025 · publ. March 2026 · source ↗
Sources
Generated September 24, 2026