⚠ The Rate RatchetModerate threat
Apple (AAPL) — threat to the moat
Every ruling and new-fee compromise nudges the effective commission a little lower.
The commission engine's power is the rate it charges; the danger is a ratchet that only turns one way. What was once a flat thirty percent on nearly everything has already been whittled1: fifteen percent for smaller developers, fifteen on the later years of a subscription, reduced2 and restructured fees under European rules, and court-ordered openings that let some developers avoid the cut altogether. In the United States a 27% fee on linked-out purchases was barred outright in 2025; the Ninth Circuit upheld the contempt finding in December 2025 but sent back the question of what reasonable, cost-based fee Apple may charge3. Each concession is defended as modest and contained, but they accumulate, and no one seriously expects the headline rate ever to climb back up. The direction is settled; only the pace is in doubt.
The danger is that the commission is at once the richest strand of the whole franchise and the most exposed, because everyone — developers, regulators, and courts — is pulling on the same thread from every side at once. As the effective rate drifts down and more transactions find lower-fee or fee-free paths around the standard commission, the engine keeps running but throws off less on each unit of traffic that passes through it.
The consolation is arithmetic and tactical at once: even a lower rate levied on a larger and still-growing base of digital commerce is a very large number, and Apple has repeatedly shown it can introduce new fees where old ones are banned, defending the substance of its take even as the headline figure falls. Access to a billion affluent users stays genuinely valuable, and Apple prices that access with skill.
A moderate worry, and the number to watch is the effective take rate, not the headline rate. This is not a collapse but a grind — a rate that gets a little lower and a little leakier over the coming years, trimming the single most profitable engine in the Services business at its edges, even as sheer growing volume keeps the absolute dollars rising for now.
- ReportedThe flat 30% has already been whittled: 15% for small developers and for later subscription years.Apple App Store — published commission schedule (15% small-business / subscriptions after year one; 30% standard) — Current schedule · publ. 2025–2026 · source ↗
- ReportedThe U.S. Epic ruling forced Apple to allow external purchase links without taking a commission.Epic Games v. Apple (N.D. Cal.) — anti-steering injunction; 2025 contempt ruling requiring Apple to permit external purchase links without commission in the U.S. — Injunction 2021; contempt ruling Apr 30, 2025 · publ. 2021–2025 · source ↗
- ReportedThe Ninth Circuit upheld the contempt finding in December 2025 but held the total ban on commissions overbroad, allowing a reasonable cost-based fee.Fenwick, 'Ninth Circuit Largely Upholds Ruling in Epic v. Apple' (22 December 2025) — the panel upheld the contempt finding but held the total ban on commissions for linked-out purchases overbroad; Apple may charge a commission based on costs genuinely and reasonably necessary, and the district court's original injunction had faced a 27% commission — Ninth Circuit ruling, December 2025 · publ. 22 December 2025 · source ↗
- Apple Form 10-K, FY2025 — Business & Risk Factors (SEC EDGAR)
- EU Digital Markets Act — official European Commission site
- Ninth Circuit ruling in Epic v. Apple (Fenwick summary, December 2025)